Not surprised at the story on several levels. I have seen some results in an ancient issue of OL (circa 'late 1970s) I was rereading a couple weeks ago where the issue of shotgun v rifle was studied and several commisions concluded that there was not that much difference in "safety levels" and about the only difference was that shotguns had shorter range which might be beneficial.
Tragic thing is that following the basic tenet of gun handling (know your background and what is beyond) seems to be ignored by some hunters and replaced by "get yer game no matter what". As such, stories such as this will not enhance the future of rifle hunting in a number of locales or the image of hunters in general.
Tragic thing is that following the basic tenet of gun handling (know your background and what is beyond) seems to be ignored by some hunters and replaced by "get yer game no matter what". As such, stories such as this will not enhance the future of rifle hunting in a number of locales or the image of hunters in general.